LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE ADVOCATE PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR MEMBERS WHO CONFRONT THE LAW IN CARRYING OUT THEIR PROFESSION

Main Article Content

ABDULLAH EMILE OEMAR ALAMUDY, MARYANO, IDZAM FAUTANU, FAUZIE YUSUF HASIBUAN

Abstract

Advocates are one of the legal professions in Indonesia. Advocates have the duty and function to ensure legal justice can be upheld in court. An Advocate is a person who has been deemed capable and eligible to become an Advocate in accordance with the qualifications established by laws and regulations. The Advocate organization determines the eligibility of an Advocate. The Advocate Organization also functions as a party that oversees all Advocates and ensures that all Advocates act by implementing the Advocate code of ethics. Advocate organizations also serve as protection providers for all Advocate members when faced with the law. This study aims to analyze the responsibilities of the Advocate Professional organization if Advocate members are dealing with legal cases. The research used a descriptive qualitative method with a literature study approach. The data used is secondary data sourced from the results of library observations conducted by researchers. The study results show that several actions can be categorized as responsible actions carried out by advocate organizations if members conflict with the law in their profession. These actions include directing investigators to ask permission from the organization if they intend to conduct investigations on members. Another action is to assist all members who are dealing with the law.

Article Details

Section
Public Law
Author Biography

ABDULLAH EMILE OEMAR ALAMUDY, MARYANO, IDZAM FAUTANU, FAUZIE YUSUF HASIBUAN

Abdullah Emile Oemar Alamudy1, Maryano2, Idzam Fautanu3, Fauzie Yusuf Hasibuan4

1,2,3,4 Law Studies, Jayabaya University, Jakarta

References

Ansari. 2019. Management Implementation of the Indonesian Advocates Association (PERADI) in Organizing Advocate Profession Special Education. Al-Mabsut 13(2). 23-41

Daryanti, Silvia. PJ, Nyoman United & Purwoto. 2017. Criminal Accountability of Advocates Perpetrators of Bribery Against Judges. Diponegoro Law Journal 6(2). 1-15

Gems, Chusnul Qotimah Nita. Haidarrani, Ananda & Sumbowo, Eri Bambang Budi. 2022. Professional Ethics of Legal Advisors or Advocates When Proceeding in Court. Amsir Law Jaournal 3(2). 93-102.

Gen, Sheldon & Wright, Amy Conley. Strategies of Policy Advocacy Organizations and Their Theoretical Affinities: Evidence from Q-Methodology. Policy Studies Journal 46(2). 298-326.

Gunawan. 2018. Position, Role and Function of Advocates in the Criminal Justice Process (Efforts to Straighten Negative Public Perceptions of Advocates). Glorification of the Law 1(1). 47-72.

Hasibuan, Paet. Azmi, Muhammad Nurul & Lubis, Fauziah. Term of Office of the Leaders of the Advocate Professional Organization through a Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia. Journal on Education 5(2). 1850-1854

Hatono. 2019. Implementation of Legal Sanctions for Advocates Perpetrating the Crime of Bribery in the Positive Legal System in Indonesia. Journal of Legal Scholars 5(1). 77-98

Isnantiana. 2019. Law and Legal System as Pillars of the State. Journal of Sharia Economic Law 2(1). 19-35.

Jasmine, Dwi Putri. 2017. The Existence of Advocate Immunity in Criminal Law Enforcement. Justicia Science 2(2). 183-194

Khalid, Afif. 2019. Attempts to Criminalize Advocates in the Legal Profession. Borneo Law Journal 3(2). 136-170

Khambali, Muhammad. 2017. Unlimited Advocate Immunity. Legal Horizon 14(1). 18-29

Knuckey, Sarah., Hoffman, Benjamin., Perelman, Jeremy., Reddy, Gulika., Ancheita, Alejandra & Jain, Meetali. 2020. Power in Human Rights Advocate and Rightsholder Relationship: Critiques, Reforms, and Challenges. Harvard Human Rights Journal 33. 1-56

Malik, Prayudi. Sampara, Said & Qamar, Nurul. 2020. Analysis of the Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 35 PUU-XVI/2018 concerning Advocate Organizations. Journal of Lex Generalis 1(7). 989-1010

Oktavianti, Risky. 2019. Obstruction of Justice by Advocates Against Investigation and Investigation of Corruption Crimes. Thesis. Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University. Jakarta

Panjaitan, Budi Literature. 2019. Advocate Profession as a Noble Profession. Journal of Tectum LPPM Asahan University 1 (1). 136-143

Pramono, Agus. 2018. Analysis of the Legislative Ratio of Honors Against Ethics Enforcement Advocate Profession. UNTAG Law Review 2(2). 177-188

Putranto Urip. 2019. Obligation to Provide Legal Assistance by an Advocate in His Position as Officium Nobile. De Jure Plenary 8(1). 39-47

Risdalina. 2019. Relations Between Advocates and Clients in Enforcement of Civil Law. Advocacy Scientific Journal 7(1). 9-20.

Setiawan, Arif., Wicaksono, Lucky Suryo., Anisah, Siti & Nugroho, Eko Rial. 2017. Comparison of Arrangements for Advocate Professional Education (PPA) in Indonesia and the United States. Legal Arena 10(1). 120-140

Sinapoy, M. Sabaruddin. 2012. Legal Responsibilities of the President in Granting Permits to Examine State Officials. Juridika 27(3). 217-232

Siritus, Syahrul. 2019. Authority of the Indonesian Advocates Association in proposing an advocate's oath (Juridical Analysis of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 35/PUU-XVII/2018). Journal of Wisdom 16(2). 85-94.

Solikin, Nur & Rohmatullah, Anis. 2022. The Regulatory Reform of Advocate Organizations in Proposing Oath of Prospective Advocates in Indonesia. Journal of Law Renewal Studies 2(2). 133-154

Sulastri, Lusia & Nughroho, Norcha Satria Adi. 2020. Reconstruction on The Regulations of Advocate Organizational System as Accountability for The Quality of Professions. Journal of Legal Dynamics 20(1). 210-228

Susanto. Nurhayati & Herdiana, Dadan. 2023. Disobedience to the Law: Measuring the Advocate Organization's Compliance with Judge Decisions that Have Permanent Legal Force. Jurisprudence 6(1). 67-82.

Tambunan, Selamat & Supriyanto, Bambang Heri. 2023. Advocate Immunity Rights in Indonesian Principles, Concepts, Legislation. International Journal of Social Science (IJSS) 2(5). 2275-2294