ACADEMIC RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY IS AN INTERPLAY BETWEEN TEACHER’S ATTRIBUTE AND STUDENT’S CHARACTERISTICS WITH THE INFLUENCE OF INSTITUTIONAL MANDATE.
Main Article Content
Abstract
The study generated the theory in the teaching of research. It utilized the inductive method of theory generation, and the researcher used the narrative inquiry approach. Furthermore, the proponent applied the six phases of Labov’s narrative analysis in the stories, as told by the teachers who participated in the study. Six identified different areas in the investigation: abstract, orientation, complicating action, evaluation, resolution, and coda. It created a thematic analysis and adapted the six phases of Braun and Clark. The study’s findings revealed three themes: Myself, Myself and others, and myself and the Institution. The extracted narratives in the re-storying of the six professors involved came up with the following hypothesis: Academic research productivity governs teachers’ attributes: Academic research productivity influences students’ characteristics: And academic research productivity affects institutional mandates. This theory emerged as stated: Academic research productivity is an interplay between teacher’s attributes and student’s characteristics with the influence of the institutional sanction.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Al-Amarat, M.S. (2011). “The Classroom Problem Faced Teachers at Public School in Tafila Province, and Proposed Solution, International Journal of Science,
Anderson, J.M. (2015). Where are the main differences between ‘Phenomenology and Grounded Theory’ in Qualitative Methods and Inquiry,
Avan, B.I., & White F. (2001). The Proposition: An Insight into Research, Journal of Pakistan Medical Association, Barraket, J. (2005) “Teaching Research Method Using a Student –Centered Approach? Critical Reflections onPractice”, 2005.
Bernstein, B. (1986). (On pedagogic discourse. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for sociology of education. New York: Greenwood Press, 1986.
Caruth, G. (2015). “Extentialism and Its Underpinnings for Andragogy”, April 2015.
Chan, S. (2010). “Application of Andragogy in Mutli-Disciplined Teaching and Learning”, Journal of Adult Education, November 2, 2010.
Clutterbuck, D. (2013). “The Problem with Research in Mentoring’, 2013.
Design Mentoring, (2012). “How to Address Conflicts or Concerns in a Mentor-Mentee Relationship”, 2012. Devendorf, S. (2003). “John Dewey: A Pioneer in Educational Philosophy, October 2003.
Earley, M. (2014) A synthesis of the literature on research methods education, Teaching in Higher Education, 19 (3), 242–253. doi:10.1080/13562517.2013.860105 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
European Commission (2017). Under the MARIE SKŁODOWSKA-CURIE actions, has the definition of Early Stage Researcher ESR) changed from FP7 to H2020’, November 13, 2017.
Frey, K. B. (2015). “Philosophy of Education: The Nature of the Learner Freire, P. (1996). “Pedagogy of the Oppressed.
Glaser, A & Strauss B. (2012). “The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine Transaction, New Brunswick,.
Griffiths, V. (2014). Reflections of a Researcher Teacher, Journal of Education,
Healey, M. (2005). Linking research and teaching: exploring disciplinary Spaces and the role of inquiry-based learning.
Henschke, J.A. (2009). “Beginnings of the History and Philosophy of Andragogy, 1833-2000”, 2009.
Howard, C. and Brady, M. (2015) Teaching social research methods after the critical turn: challenges and benefits of a constructivist pedagogy, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18 (5), 511–525. doi:10.1080/13645579.2015.1062625[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar])
Lewthwaite, S & Nind, M. (2016) Teaching Research Methods in the Social Sciences: Expert Perspectives on Pedagogy and Practice, British Journal of Educational Studies, 64:4, 413-430, DOI: 10.1080/00071005. 2016.1197882 Mishra R.K. (2013). “Vygotskian Perspective of Teaching-Learning, December 2013
Nind et al. (2015bNind, M., Kilburn, D. and Wiles, R. (2015b) Using video and dialogue to generate pedagogic knowledge: teachers, learners and researchers reflecting together on the pedagogy of social research methods, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18 (5), 561–57. doi:10.1080/13645579.2015.1062628 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar])
O'Donnell K., Botelho, J., Brown, J. González, G.M., & Head, W., (2005). ‘Undergraduate Research and Its Impact on Student Success for Underrepresented Students’, March 4, 2015.
Osman, A. & Rugut, E.J. (2013). “Reflection on Paulo Freire and Classroom Relevance, March 2013.
Petrova, Z. (2013). “On the Relevancy of using Vygotsky’s Theoretical Framework to Legitimize Dialogic Teaching/Learning, 2013.
Pappas, C. (2013). ‘The Adult Learning Theory - Andragogy- of Malcolm Knowles’, May 19, 2013. Sikandar, A. (2015), “John Dewey and His Philosophy of Education, December 2015
Wang, V. (2015). “Integrating Adult Learning and Technology for Effective Education: Strategic Approached, December 2009.
Westbrook J., Durrani, N., Pryor, J., Boddy, J., Salvi, S. (2011). “Pedagogy, Curriculum, Teaching Practices and Teacher Education in Developing Countries, 2011.
Zmeyov, M. (1998). ‘Andraogy: Origins, Developments and Trends, 1998.