MASS LINE METHOD AND GRAMSCI’S PHILOSOPHY OF PRAXIS TO RITUAL PROPRIETY: AN OVERVIEW
Main Article Content
Abstract
Jaspers, in 1949, coined the term ‘Axial Age’, as an age in which humans apparently became more analytical and reflective. Despite this great age, humanity is arguably still balanced in continuing regression against the former axial age. The overall research objective of this paper is therefore to examine critically the contemporary socialist attempt at combatting this regression. Chinese politics is a process of image creation, that, in turn generates new knowledge in the people, while ‘politics in command’ infers the same precept that Gramsci had called the ‘philosophy of praxis’. The mass line was a systematic and enduring set of programs and policies, prescribing the optimal form of propriety between the masses and the Party’s leadership. Xunzi had written a full account of the origin of ritual propriety and its relationship to these problematic facets of human nature. The research question asks how putting politics in command could inform party leadership by means of the philosophy of praxis. The argument sets out to bring proof for the proposition that deployment of the mass line would allow the gleaning of an epistemology of ritual propriety between the superstructure and the masses. The research paradigm is a cumulative synthesis made into new knowledge, built on top of well-established research. Thus, the manuscript’s research methodology is the construction of an argument constrained within a legal narrative concerning the various facets of Gramsci’s exegeses on folklore. Without the philosophy of praxis, governments would want to eradicate any folklore that challenged the ruling party’s worldview and legitimacy, charging such challengers as having been derelict in their externally imposed duties. This kind of contradiction is thus managed in the sole interests of a ruling class, and its unintended artifact is a truncation of creativity both within and by hegemonic groups. Gramsci conceived of the resultant subaltern groupings as being deliberately created by linguistic irradiation, so creating a war of position of self-developed identities against externally imposed identities. Combatting this, the mass line establishes the dialectical position of political activity as differentiation in the superstructures, inferring that to improve quality of life, the political activity must take control of the superstructure.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
1883–1969.
Karl Jaspers, The Origin and Goal of History, Taylor & Francis, New York, 2021.
Barbara O’Brien, ‘What was the axial age?’, Patheos, 2nd September 2022.
Hyobom Pak, ‘Chinese Politics: The Nature of Its "Mass Image" Technique’, Asian Survey, vol. 5, no. 4, 1965, pp. 197-206 , p. 199.
‘Chairman Mao Reviews Mighty Cultural Revolutionary Contingents for the 7th Time’, Peking Review, vol. 9, no. 47, 1966, pp. 5-7.
Hyobom Pak, ‘Chinese Politics: The Nature of Its "Mass Image" Technique’, Asian Survey, vol. 5, no. 4, 1965, pp. 197-206 , p. 199.
See Plato, Letter 7, for an explanation of the positioning of image as a necessary step to gaining knowledge.
Antonio Gramsci, Further Selections from the Prison Notebooks, ed. and transl. by Derek Boothman, London 1994, Notebook 8, §61.
Graham Young, ‘On the Mass Line’, Modern China, vol. no. 2, 1980, pp. 225-240, p. 226.
Mao Zedong, Selected Works of Mao Tse-tung, Vol. III. Foreign Languages Press, Beijing, 1967, vol. III, pp. 117-122.
Mao Zedong, Selected Works of Mao Tse-tung, Vol. III. Foreign Languages Press, Beijing, 1967, vol. III, p. 264.
Thomas Bodenheimer, ‘The Role of Intellectuals in Class Struggle’, Synthesis, vol. 1, no. 1, 1976, pp. 20-27, pp. 21-24.
Antonio Gramsci, Further Selections from the Prison Notebooks, ed. and transl. by Derek Boothman, London 1994, Notebook 8, §61.
Xunzi, Discourse on Ritual Propriety, 70/19/1-2; K: 19.1a; W: 89.
Mao Zedong, Selected Works of Mao Tse-tung, Vol. III. Foreign Languages Press, Beijing, 1967, vol. III, pp. 22; 40-43.
Mao Zedong, Selected Works of Mao Tse-tung, Vol. III. Foreign Languages Press, Beijing, 1967, vol. III, p. 264.
Mao Zedong, Selected Works of Mao Tse-tung, Vol. III. Foreign Languages Press, Beijing, 1967, vol. III, p. 13.
Alberto Cirese, ‘Gramsci’s Observations on Folklore’, in A. Showstack Sassoon (ed.), Approaches to Gramsci, pp. 212–47. Writers and Readers, London, 1982, p. 224.
Mao Zedong, Selected Works of Mao Tse-tung, Vol. III. Foreign Languages Press, Beijing, 1967, vol. III, p. 41.
For a description of the structure and purpose of ‘legal narrative’, see Frank J. D’Angelo, Composition in the Classical Tradition, Allyn and Bacon, New York, 2000, pp. 22 et seq.
Felice Platone (ed.), Letteratura e vita nazionale, Einaudi, Turin, 1950.
Jack Zipes, ‘Giuseppe Pitrè and the Great Collectors of Folk Tales in the Nineteenth Century’, in Jack Zipes, The Irresistible Fairy Tale: The Cultural and Social History of a Genre, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2012.
‘Definitions of Folklore’, Journal of Folklore Research, vol. 33, no. 3, 1996, pp. 255-264, p. 255.
Hans Kelsen, General Theory of Law And State, The Lawbook Exchange, New York, 2007, p. 392.
Friedrich Nietsche, Thus Spake Zarathustra, Logos, West Beach, 2017.
Antonio Gramsci, Selections from Cultural Writings, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1985, p. 355.
Stephen Olbrys Gencarella, ‘Gramsci, Good Sense, and Critical Folklore Studies’, Journal of Folklore Research, vol. 47, no. 3, 2010, pp. 221-252, p. 225.
Tommaso Di Carpegna Falconieri & William McCuaig, The man who believed he was king of France: a true medieval tale, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2008, p. 152.
Antonio Gramsci, Selections from Cultural Writings, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1985, p. 351.
Antonio Gramsci, Selections from Cultural Writings, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1985, p. 213.
Antonio Gramsci, Selections from Cultural Writings, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1985, p. 141.
Antonio Gramsci, Selections from Cultural Writings, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1985, p. 141.
Felice Platone (ed.), Letteratura e vita nazionale, Einaudi, Turin, 1950.
ntonio Gramsci, Selections from Cultural Writings, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1985, p. 189.
Karl Marx & Friedrich Engels, The German Ideology Including Theses on Feuerbach and Introduction to The Critique of Political Economy, Prometheus Books, Buffalo, 1998.
Alberto Cirese, ‘Gramsci’s Observations on Folklore’, in A. Showstack Sassoon (ed.), Approaches to Gramsci, pp. 212–47. Writers and Readers, London, 1982, p. 224.
Lisa A. Lewis, The Adoring audience: fan culture and popular media, Routledge, London, 1992, p. 31.
Hal Foster, Postmodern Culture, Pluto Press, London, 1995, p. vii.
Stephen Olbrys Gencarella, ‘Gramsci, Good Sense, and Critical Folklore Studies’, Journal of Folklore Research, vol. 47, no. 3, 2010, pp. 221-252, p. 226.
Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, Quintin Hoare & Geoffrey Nowell Smith (trans.), International Publishers, New York, 1971, p. 453.
Antonio Gramsci, Selections from Cultural Writings, William Boelhower (trans.), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1985, p. 190.
Edward Tylor, Primitive Culture: Research into the Development of Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Art, and Custom, John Murray, London, 1920, p. 16.
Antonio Gramsci, Selections from Cultural Writings, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1985, p. 189.
Stephen Olbrys Gencarella, ‘Gramsci, Good Sense, and Critical Folklore Studies’, Journal of Folklore Research, vol. 47, no. 3, 2010, pp. 221-252, p. 227.
Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, International Publishers, New York, 1971, p. 34.
Stefano Cavazza, ‘La folkoristica italiana e il fascismo. Il Comitato Nazionale per le Arti Populari’, La Ricerca Folklorica, vol. 15, 1987, pp. 109–22; Lynn Gunzberg, ‘Ruralism, Folklore, and Grazzia Deledda’s Novels’, Modern Language Studies, vol. 13, no. 3, 1983, pp. 112–122; William Simeone, ‘Fascists and Folklorists in Italy’, Journal of American Folklore, vol. 91, no. 359, 1978, pp. 543-557.
Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, International Publishers, New York, 1971, p. 34.
Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, International Publishers, New York, 1971, p. 34.
Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, International Publishers, New York, 1971, p. 34.
Stephen Olbrys Gencarella, ‘Gramsci, Good Sense, and Critical Folklore Studies’, Journal of Folklore Research, vol. 47, no. 3, 2010, pp. 221-252, p. 227.
Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, International Publishers, New York, 1971, p. 32.
Antonio Gramsci, Further Selections from the Prison Notebooks, ed. and transl. by Derek Boothman, London 1994, Notebook 8, §61.
Terry Eagleton, ‘Base and Superstructure Revisited’, New Literary History, vol. 31, no. 2, 2000, pp. 231-240, p. 239.
Stephen Olbrys Gencarella, ‘Gramsci, Good Sense, and Critical Folklore Studies’, Journal of Folklore Research, vol. 47, no. 3, 2010, pp. 221-252, p. 228.
Franco Lo Piparo, Lingua intellettuali egemonis in Gramsci, Laterza, Bari, 1979.
Peter Ives, Gramsci’s Politics of Language: Engaging the Bakhtin Circle and the Frankfurt School, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 2004.
Peter Ives, Gramsci’s Politics of Language: Engaging the Bakhtin Circle and the Frankfurt School, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 2004, p. 23.
Stephen Olbrys Gencarella, ‘Gramsci, Good Sense, and Critical Folklore Studies’, Journal of Folklore Research, vol. 47, no. 3, 2010, pp. 221-252, p. 228.
Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, International Publishers, New York, 1971, p. 450.
John Lyons, Language and Linguistics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1981, p. 25.
John Lyons, Language and Linguistics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1981, p. 268.
Antonio Gramsci, Selections from Cultural Writings, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1985, p. 123.
Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, International Publishers, New York, 1971, p. 325.
Matteo Bartoli, Introduzione alla neolinguistica (principi, scopi, metodi), Biblioteca dell Archivum Romanicum, Serie II: Linguistica, vol. 12. Rome, 1925; Stephen Olbrys Gencarella, ‘Gramsci, Good Sense, and Critical Folklore Studies’, Journal of Folklore Research, vol. 47, no. 3, 2010, pp. 221-252, p. 229.
Antonio Gramsci, Selections from Cultural Writings, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1985, p. 164.
Peter Ives, Gramsci’s Politics of Language: Engaging the Bakhtin Circle and the Frankfurt School, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 2004, p. 28.
Derek Boothman, ‘The Sources for Gramsci’s Concept of Hegemony’, Rethinking Marxism: A Journal of Economics, Culture & Society, vol. 20, no. 2, 2008, pp. 201-215.
Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, International Publishers, New York, 1971, p. 419.
Stephen Olbrys Gencarella, ‘Gramsci, Good Sense, and Critical Folklore Studies’, Journal of Folklore Research, vol. 47, no. 3, 2010, pp. 221-252, p. 230.
Antonio Gramsci, Further Selections from the Prison Notebooks, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1995, p. 301.
il senso commune.
il buon senso.
Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, International Publishers, New York, 1971, p. 32.
Diana Coben, ‘Metaphors for an Educative Politics: “Common Sense”, “Good Sense” and Educating Adults’, in Carmel Borg, Joseph Buttigieg & Peter Mayo (eds.), Gramsci and Education, pp. 263–90, Rowman and Littlefield. New York, 2002.
Stephen Olbrys Gencarella, ‘Gramsci, Good Sense, and Critical Folklore Studies’, Journal of Folklore Research, vol. 47, no. 3, 2010, pp. 221-252, p. 231.
Antonio Gramsci, Selections from Cultural Writings, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1985, p. 140.
Robert Ware, ‘Acts and Action’, The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 70, No. 13, 1973, pp. 403-418, p. 407
Robert Ware, ‘Acts and Action’, The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 70, No. 13, 1973, pp. 403-418, p. 417.
Robert Ware, ‘Acts and Action’, The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 70, No. 13, 1973, pp. 403-418, p. 418.
Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, International Publishers, New York, 1971, p. 328; Stephen Olbrys Gencarella, ‘Gramsci, Good Sense, and Critical Folklore Studies’, Journal of Folklore Research, vol. 47, no. 3, 2010, pp. 221-252, p. 232.
John Fulton, ‘Religion and Politics in Gramsci’, Sociological Analysis vol. 48, 1987, pp. 197–216, p. 211.
Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, International Publishers, New York, 1971, p. 331.
Jean Guiraud, Saint Dominic, Benziger, New York, 1913, pp. 65-66.
Rosalind B. Brooke, The Image of St Francis: Responses to Sainthood in the Thirteenth Century, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006.
Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, International Publishers, New York, 1971, p. 331.
Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, International Publishers, New York, 1971, p. 338.
Giuseppe Pitrè, Fiabe E Leggende Popolari Siciliane, Laurel, Palermo, 1888, p. 207.
Antonio Gramsci, Selections from Cultural Writings, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1985, pp. 334–35.
The Patti lateranensi (Lateran Accords), concluded between the Holy See and the Italian state on 11th February 1929, comprised a treaty regulating the relations between the two powers and a concordat regulating the position of the church in Italy. The treaty recognized the Holy See's independent territorial sovereignty in the area of the Vatican.
Stephen Olbrys Gencarella, ‘Gramsci, Good Sense, and Critical Folklore Studies’, Journal of Folklore Research, vol. 47, no. 3, 2010, pp. 221-252, p. 233.
Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, International Publishers, New York, 1971, p. 340.
Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, International Publishers, New York, 1971, p. 339.
The Gentile Reform’s reorganization of the system of student progress originated in the Casati Act of 1859. Livia Giacardi, ‘From Euclid as Textbook to the Giovanni Gentile Reform (1867–1923): Problems, Methods, and Debates in Mathematics Teaching in Italy’, Paedagogica Historica, vol. 42, no. 4–5, 2006, pp. 587–613.
G. Tognon, Giovanni Gentile e la riforma della scuola, in Il parlamento italiano, Milano, Nuova Cei, 1990, vol. 11.
Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, International Publishers, New York, 1971, p. 41.
Stephen Olbrys Gencarella, ‘Gramsci, Good Sense, and Critical Folklore Studies’, Journal of Folklore Research, vol. 47, no. 3, 2010, pp. 221-252, p. 234.
Antonio Gramsci, Selections from Cultural Writings, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1985, p. 42.
Antonio Gramsci, Selections from Cultural Writings, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1985, p. 413.
Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, International Publishers, New York, 1971, p. 133.
Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, International Publishers, New York, 1971, p. 133.
Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, International Publishers, New York, 1971, p. 324.
Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, International Publishers, New York, 1971, p. 323; Stephen Olbrys Gencarella, ‘Gramsci, Good Sense, and Critical Folklore Studies’, Journal of Folklore Research, vol. 47, no. 3, 2010, pp. 221-252, p. 235.
Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, International Publishers, New York, 1971, p. 324.
Antonio Gramsci, Selections from Cultural Writings, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1985, p. 418.
José E. Limón, ‘Western Marxism and Folklore: A Critical Introduction’, Journal of American Folklore, vol, 96, no. 379, 1983, pp. 34–52, p. 42.
Stephen Olbrys Gencarella, ‘Gramsci, Good Sense, and Critical Folklore Studies’, Journal of Folklore Research, vol. 47, no. 3, 2010, pp. 221-252, p. 236.
Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, International Publishers, New York, 1971, p. 197.
Thomas Bodenheimer, ‘The Role of Intellectuals in Class Struggle’, Synthesis, vol. 1, no. 1, 1976, pp. 20-27, pp. 21-24.