BAWASLU ELECTRONIC ADJUDICATION: THE FUTURE OF INDONESIA’S ELECTION PROCESS DISPUTE RESOLUTION
Main Article Content
Abstract
The Electronic Adjudication System is a system that can provide an effective, efficient and contextual dispute resolution process with the times. In 2024, Indonesia will hold general elections and simultaneous regional head elections which are scheduled almost simultaneously. Bawaslu as an election law enforcement agency is certainly not enough just to prepare human resources, but infrastructure and methods of examination are also important things to be addressed. This research examines, how is the utilization of the electronic system in resolving adjudication disputes in Bawaslu from an ius constitutum perspective? How is the utilization of the electronic system in resolving adjudication disputes in Bawaslu from the ius constituendum perspective? This research is normative research, using a statutory approach, conceptual approach and case approach. It is concluded that: first, the use of electronic systems under Bawaslu has in principle been implemented but is still limited to receiving dispute requests. Second, E-Ajudication is enforced by developing the SIPS system along with putting the legality of its use in the provisions of Article 468 of the Election Law and Article 25 of Perbawaslu Dispute Resolution. Then with the enactment of E-adjudication, evidence in the form of electronic documents becomes the main evidence in the settlement of nomination disputes.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
F. Amsari, “DESIGNING AN INTRA-PARTY DEMOCRACY IN,” vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 1–10, 2021.
M. Tanjung, R. Saraswati, and L. A.L.W, “Rekonseptualisasi Rekruitmen Penyelenggara Pemilu Untuk Mewujudkan Penyelenggara Pemilu Yang Berintegritas,” Arena Huk., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 167–192, 2021, doi: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01401.9.
S. Emilia, V. Miruna-Elena, and S. Emil, “E-voting protocols in context of COVID19,” no. January, 2021.
G. A. Prabowo, “Pengaturan Penyelesaian Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara Secara Elektronik,” Jurist-Diction, vol. 4, no. 4, p. 1399, 2021, doi: 10.20473/jd.v4i4.28454.
M. Wahdini, “The Effectiveness of Simultaneous Election 2019: Evaluation Through the Simultaneous Election 2024,” J. Bina Praja, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 123–134, 2022, doi: 10.21787/jbp.14.2022.123-134.
H. S. R. Tinambunan, H. Widodo, and G. A. Ahmad, “The reconstruction of revocation againts the rights to vote or to be voted in public post for those who are found guilty in corruption case in Indonesia from a progressive legal perspective,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 953, no. 1, pp. 0–5, 2018, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/953/1/012170.
Shidarta, Hukum Penalaran dan Penalaran Hukum. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishig, 2013.
S. Supriyadi, “Menakar Nilai Keadilan Penyelenggaraan Pilkada 2020 di Tengah Pandemi Covid-19,” Kanun J. Ilmu Huk., 2020, doi: 10.24815/kanun.v22i3.17466.
E. Sundusiyah, Hariyanto, “Implementasi Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Tentang E-Court Untuk Mewujudkan Asas Sederhana, Cepat Dan Biaya Ringan Di Pengadilan Agama Pamekasan,” Arena Huk., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 471–498, 2022.
R. D. Pettalolo and K. Fahmi, “Kajian Evaluatif Penanganan Pelanggaran Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Serentak 2020,” Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum, p. 200, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://bawaslu.go.id/sites/default/files/publikasi/E-BOOK PENANGANAN PELANGGARAN PILKADA 2020.pdf.
K. Fahmi, “Sistem Keadilan Pemilu dalam Penanganan Pelanggaran dan Sengketa Proses Pemilu Serentak 2019 di Sumatera Barat Electoral Justice System in Handling 2019 Concurrent Election Violations and Disputes in West Sumatra,” J. Konstitusi, vol. 17, pp. 1–26, 2020.
Muh. Risnain, “Eksistensi Lembaga Quasi Judisial Dalam Sistem Kekuasaan Kehakiman Di Indonesia : Kajian Terhadap Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha,” J. Huk. dan Peradil., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 248–253, 2020.
Noor Ifah, “Kelemahan Verifikasi Persyaratan Administrasi Calon Dalam Perspektif Pemilu Berintegritas : Studi Verifikasi Persyaratan Administrasi Calon Anggota Dprd Kabupaten Probolinggo Dan Sidoarjo Pada Pemilu Legislatif Tahun 2014,” Electoran Gov., pp. 73–95, 2014.
Guy S. Goodwin-Gill, “Free and Fair Elections,” Inter-Parliamentary Union Geneva, p. 81, 2006.
Ni’matul Huda, Negara Hukum, Demokrasi, Judicial Review. Yogyakarta: UII-Press, 2005.
M. Azzahiroh, H. A. Zamahsari, and Y. Mahameru, “Implementasi Aplikasi E-Court Dalam Mewujudkan Pelayanan Publik Yang Baik Di Pengadilan Negeri Kota Malang,” J. Teknol. dan Komun. Pemerintah., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 58–74, 2020, doi: 10.33701/jtkp.v2i2.2318.
Akhmad Hairil Anwar, “Peran Bawaslu dalam Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan Pemilu,” Voice Justisia, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 74–89, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://www.ptonline.com/articles/how-to-get-better-mfi-results.
Raden A. H. Soeprodjo, “Dokumen Elektronik Sebagai Alat Bukti Yang Sah Dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Pidana Di Pengadilan,” Lex Crim., vol. IV, no. 2, pp. 23–31, 2015.
M. Harun, “Philosophical Study of Hans Kelsen’s Thoughts on Law and Satjipto Rahardjo’s Ideas on Progressive Law,” Walisongo Law Rev., 2019, doi: 10.21580/walrev.2019.2.2.4815.
K. Fahmi, “Menelusuri Konsep Keadilan Pemilihan Umum Menurut UUD 1945,” J. Cita Huk., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 167–186, 2016, doi: 10.15408/jch.v4i2.4098.