CONSTITUTIONAL COURT AS MEDIATOR: A MODELS AND SOLUTIONS TO ARMED CONFLICT AND THE RULE OF LAW IN PAPUA, INDONESIA
Main Article Content
Abstract
Conflicts and tensions in Papua that have occurred for a long time, continue to escalate in 2021 until until April 2023 with quite complex problems. This study analyses the concept of the Constitutional Court as a mediator which is used as a model and solution for armed conflict and the rule of law in Papua, Indonesia. Using a normative legal research approach by collecting primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. In order to get answers to research problems, the four models of problem solving approaches are used statute approach, conceptual approach, comparative approach, historical approach. This research uses descriptive-prescriptive and content analysis. The result of this research is the granting of new authority to the Constitutional Court through amendments to the 1945 Constitution, because it sees the opportunity for the Constitutional Court to become a mediator in resolving armed conflicts carried out by the government and KKB/KSB/OPM in Papua, thereby creating security, order & peace.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
E. Tolib and A. C. D. Panjaitan, “Konsekuensi Penetapan Status Kelompok Kriminal Bersenjata (KKB) Papua sebagai Teroris Menurut Hukum Pidana,” Rechtidee, vol. 16, no. 2, p. 1, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.21107/ri.v16i2.11823.
M. Hafiz and S. M. Pratama, “Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Penetapan Kelompok Kriminal Bersenjata (KKB) Papua Sebagai Kelompok Teroris Dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Nasional,” J. Huk. Mimb. Justitia, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 88, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.35194/jhmj.v7i1.
B. Anugerah, “Papua: Mengurai Konflik dan Merumuskan Solusi,” J. Kaji. LEMHANNAS RI, vol. 40, no. 23, p. 54, 2019, doi: http://jurnal.lemhannas.go.id/index.php/jkl/article/view/111/32.
Fadrik Aziz Firdausi, “Sejarah Pepera 1969: Upaya Lancung RI Merebut Papua?,” tirto.id, 2019. https://tirto.id/sejarah-pepera-1969-upaya-lancung-ri-merebut-papua-egAj (accessed Jul. 03, 2022).
Tribunnews.com, “Kurang dari 3 Bulan sudah Tewaskan 12 Orang, Berikut Daftar Korban dari Aksi KKB di Papua,” Tribunnews.com, 2022. https://video.tribunnews.com/view/342465/kurang-dari-3-bulan-sudah-tewaskan-12-orang-berikut-daftar-korban-dari-aksi-kkb-di-papua (accessed Mar. 11, 2022).
Nadia Riso, “Jenazah Anggota TNI Korban Penembakan KKB Papua Tiba di Kampung Halaman,” kumparan.com, 2022. https://kumparan.com/kumparannews/jenazah-anggota-tni-korban-penembakan-kkb-papua-tiba-di-kampung-halaman-1yNjoeaCqZz (accessed Jul. 03, 2022).
M. O. C. Wiguna, “Pemikiran Hukum Progresif untuk Perlindungan Hukum dan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Hukum Adat,” J. Konstitusi, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 123, 2021, doi: 10.31078/jk1816.
W. Wulandari, N. S. Putri, W. Sulistyani, and E. M. Chandra, “Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi : Dampaknya terhadap Perubahan Undang-Undang dan Penegakan Hukum Pidana,” J. Konstitusi, vol. 18, no. 3, p. 481, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1831.
S. Soekanto and S. Mamudji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2001.
Zico Junius Fernando et al, The Freedom of Expression in Indonesia, vol. 8, no. 1. Cogent, 2022.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media, 2005.
Z. J. Fernando, “Perampasan Aset Pelaku Tindak Pidana dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia dan Prinsip Hukum Pidana,” J. Legis. Indones., vol. 19, no. 1, p. 85, 2022, doi: 10.22212/jnh.v10i1.1217.84.
Z. J. Fernando, “Pancasila Sebagai Ideologi Pemberantasan Kejahatan Korporasi Di Indonesia,” Supremasi Huk., vol. 29, no. 2, p. 79, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.33369/jsh.29.2.78-90.
N. O. Torres and J. P. S. Casas, “El Concepto de Familia en la Jurisprudencia de la Corte Constitucional Colombiana y su Incidencia en las Políticas Públicas: Una Lectura en Clave Hermenéutica,” Rev. Derecho del Estado, no. 52, pp. 175–206, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.18601/01229893.N52.06.
Mahkamah Konstitusi, “Kedudukan Dan Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia,” mkri.id, 2011. https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.ProfilMK&id=3 (accessed Jul. 01, 2022).
Titik Triwulan Tutik, Konstruksi Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana, 2010.
O. W. Lembcke, “Empirical Research on the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany. A Short Report on the State of the Art in Political Science,” Zeitschrift fur Rechtssoziologie, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 89–105, May 2022, doi: 10.1515/ZFRS-2022-0005/MACHINEREADABLECITATION/RIS.
I. N. Raditya, “Amandemen UUD 1945 Dilakukan 4 Kali, Sejarah, & Perubahan Pasal,” tirto.id, 2020. https://tirto.id/amandemen-uud-1945-dilakukan-4-kali-sejarah-perubahan-pasal-f7Cw (accessed Jul. 01, 2022).
Kompasiana, “Amandemen ke-5 UUD 1945: Suatu Keniscayaan Konstitusional Dalam Rezim Reformasi,” kompasiana.com, 2017. https://www.kompasiana.com/jkxjlajl/588721e46d7e61e506878c2c/amandemen-ke5-uud-1945-suatu-keniscayaan-konstitusional-dalam-rezim-reformasi (accessed Jul. 02, 2022).
Hukum Online, “Guru Besar Ini Jelaskan Konsep Keadilan Restoratif dalam RKUHP,” 2021. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/guru-besar-ini-jelaskan-konsep-keadilan-restoratif-dalam-rkuhp-lt603270d0b4ac1 (accessed Mar. 01, 2022).
Fatkhurohman dkk, Memahami Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi Di Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2004.
A. Triningsih, A. E. Subiyanto, and N. Nurhayani, “Kesadaran Berkonstitusi bagi Penegak Hukum terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai Upaya Menjaga Kewibawaan Peradilan,” J. Konstitusi, vol. 18, no. 4, p. 903, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1848.
Y. Asemki, A. Nurmandi, and I. Muallidin, “The Dynamics of Cyber-Activists in the Digital Era of Papua, Indonesia,” pp. 377–388, 2023, doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-2394-4_35.
A. Etra, “Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Perlindungan Hak Pilih dalam Negara Hukum Demokratis,” J. Konstitusi, vol. 19, no. 2, p. 482, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.31078/jk%25x Article Metrics.
E. Pratiwi, “Teori Utilitarianisme Jeremy Bentham : Tujuan Hukum atau Metode Pengujian Produk Hukum ?,” J. Konstitusi, vol. 19, no. 2, p. 270, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1922.
E. M. C. Sinaga and G. P. Claudia, “Pembaharuan Sistem Hukum Nasional Terkait Pengesahan Perjanjian Internasional dalam Perlindungan Hak Konstitusional,” J. Konstitusi, vol. 18, no. 3, p. 686, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1839.
A. R. Baidhowah, “Defender of Democracy: The Role of Indonesian Constitutional Court in Preventing Rapid Democratic Backsliding,” Const. Rev., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 124–152, May 2021, doi: 10.31078/consrev715.
Y. Y. Taum, “Kekerasan Dan Konflik Di Papua: Akar Masalah DanStrategi Mengatasinya,” J. Penelit., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1–2, 2019, doi: https://e-journal.usd.ac.id/index.php/JP/article/view/980.
N. S. T. Mambraku, “Penyelesaian Konflik Di Tanah Papua Dalam Perspektif Politik,” J. Kaji., vol. 20, no. 2, p. 78, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.22212/kajian.v20i2.571.
S. Hendrianto, “Constitutionalized But Not Constitute: The Case of Right to Social Security in Indonesia,” Const. Rev., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 241–281, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.31078/CONSREV623.
S. Mujaddidi, “Konstitusionalitas Pembatasan Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi,” J. Konstitusi, vol. 18, no. 3, p. 542, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1833.
U. Suropati, “Solusi Komprehensif Menuju Papua Baru: Penyelesaian Konflik Papua secara Damai, Adil, dan Bermartabat,” J. Kaji. Lemhannas RI, vol. 37, no. Jakarta, p. 86, 2019, [Online]. Available: http://jurnal.lemhannas.go.id/index.php/jkl/article/view/52.
J. Ríos-Figueroa, “Constitutional Courts as Mediators. Armed Conflict, Civil-Military Relations, and the Rule of Law in Latin America,” Int. J. Const. Law, vol. 16, no. 3, p. 1030, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moy076.
J. Ríos-Figueroa, “Constitutional courts as mediators: Armed conflict, civil-military relations, and the rule of law in Latin America,” Const. Court. as Mediat. Armed Conflict, Civil-Military Relations, Rule Law Lat. Am., pp. 1–238, Apr. 2016, doi: 10.1093/ICON/MOY076.
Nehal Bhuta, “Are Sovereigns Entitled to the Benefit of the International Rule of Law? An Introduction,” Eur. J. Int. Law, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 13–14, 2011, doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ ejil/chr043.
M. S. Buana, “Legal-Political Paradigm of Indonesian Constitutional Court: Defending a Principled Instrumentalist Court,” Const. Rev., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 36–66, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.31078/CONSREV612.
W. Bagus Surya Prabowo, “Konsistensi Pembuatan Norma Hukum dengan Doktrin Judicial Activism dalam Putusan Judicial Review,” J. Konstitusi, vol. 19, no. 2, p. 365, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1925.
L. Hakim and N. Kurniawan, “Membangun Paradigma Hukum HAM Indonesia Berbasis Kewajiban Asasi Manusia,” J. Konstitusi, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 875–876, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1847.
Khotibul Umam, Penyelesaian Sengketa diluar Pengadilan. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Pustaka Yustisia, 2010.
Lysa Angrayni, “Kebijakan Mediasi Penal Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Ringan Perspektif Restorative Justice,” J. Huk. Respulica, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 19, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.31849/respublica.v16i1.1428.
Desriza Ratman, Mediasi Non Litigasi Terhadap Sengketa Medik Dengan Konsep Win-Win Solution. Jakarta: PT Elex Media Komputindo, 2012.
T. Rahmadi, Mediasi Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Pendekatan Mufakat. Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2017.
Musahadi, Mediasi Dan Resolusi Konflik Di Indonesia. Semarang: Walisongo Mediation Center, 2007.