TELEMEDICINE ABORTION DURING COVID – 19 AND THE CHALLENGES IN ITS APPLICABILITY IN MALAYSIA
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article investigates the loopholes in Malaysia’s abortion law that make it challenging for Malaysia to implement the use of telemedicine for abortion during Covid – 19. The purpose of this paper could contribute to a reform in abortion law to ensure the legitimacy of abortion via telemedicine in an emergency situation like COVID – 19 pandemic. This article started out by analyzing Utilitarian theory and the Principle of Reproductive Autonomy. Both the theories and the principle of law arguably reflect that abortion is legitimate including during COVID–19. Following that, this article discusses the advantages of abortion via telemedicine as a whole. Further to this, the article will discuss the local literature on abortion to reflect that the law on abortion in Malaysia is ambiguous and outdated which makes it challenging to implement a new method of abortion via telemedicine. The last part is the comparative study and the author collates the challenges to enabling abortion via telemedicine in Malaysia. It is argued that, while telemedicine is a legitimate method for abortion to be used during the COVID-19 pandemic, it is difficult to implement the applicability in Malaysia due to the undeveloped and ambiguous law on abortion at the current stake. The author concluded that the current abortion law should be reformed and that much more work needs to be done before abortion via telemedicine can be reached its applicability. This article is significant because it paves the way for further research on telemedicine abortion from a Malaysian perspective.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Aiken A and others, ‘Effectiveness, Safety and Acceptability of No‐test Medical Abortion (Termination of Pregnancy) Provided via Telemedicine: A National Cohort Study’ (2021) 128 BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 1464
Amnesty International, ‘Amnesty International’s Policy on Abortion : Explanatory Note’ (2020) POL 30/2847/2020
Archer N, ‘The Law, Trials and Imprisonment for Abortion in Malaysia’ (2018)
Athira N, ‘Abandoned By Family In A Pandemic’ (The ASEAN Post, 23 February 2021) <https://theaseanpost.com/article/abandoned-family-pandemic> accessed 15 March 2023
Berer M, ‘Abortion Law and Policy Around the World: In Search of Decriminalization’ (2017) 19 Health and Human Rghts Journal
Cousins S, ‘COVID-19 Has “Devastating” Effect on Women and Girls’ (2020) 396 The Lancet 301
Dworkin R, Life’s Dominion: An Argument about Abortion, Euthanasia, and Individual Freedom (Knopf 1993)
Endler M and others, ‘Telemedicine for Medical Abortion: A Systematic Review’ (2019) 126 BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 1094
Erdman JN, ‘Harm Reduction, Human Rights, and Access to Information on Safer Abortion’ (2012) 118 International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 83
Farah Insyirah Azman and Kritigeswari Ramesh, ‘THE INFLUENCE OF MORALITY, ACTIVISTS AND HOLISTIC VIEW BEHIND CURRENT LAWS AND POLICIES, IN THE EFFORT TO DESIGN A BETTER GUIDELINE GOVERNING ABORTION IN MALAYSIA’ [2021] International Waqaf Ilmu Nusantara
Garcia-Moreno C and Amin A, ‘Violence against Women: Where Are We 25 Years after ICPD and Where Do We Need to Go?’ (2019) 27 Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters 346
Gill R and Norman WV, ‘Telemedicine and Medical Abortion: Dispelling Safety Myths, with Facts’ (2018) 4 mHealth 3
Hwei Mian Lim, ‘Country Profile : On Universal Access to Sexual and Reproductive Health Malaysia’ (2015)
Ishola F, Ukah UV and Nandi A, ‘Impact of Abortion Law Reforms on Women’s Health Services and Outcomes: A Systematic Review Protocol’ (2021) 10 Systematic Reviews 192
Low W-Y and others, ‘Access to Safe Legal Abortion in Malaysia: Women’s Insights and Health Sector Response’ (2015) 27 Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health 33
Luna Z, ‘“Truly a Women of Color Organization”: Negotiating Sameness and Difference in Pursuit of Intersectionality’ (2016) 30 Gender & Society 769
Neville CW, ‘Telehealth: A Balanced Look at Incorporating This Technology Into Practice’ (2018) 4 SAGE Open Nursing 237796081878650
Rodriguez-Osorio CA and Dominguez-Cherit G, ‘Medical Decision Making: Paternalism versus Patient-Centered (Autonomous) Care’: (2008) 14 Current Opinion in Critical Care 708
Serper M and Volk ML, ‘Current and Future Applications of Telemedicine to Optimize the Delivery of Care in Chronic Liver Disease’ (2018) 16 Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 157
Sinar daily, ‘Baby Dumping Still Rampant’ (17 February 2022) <https://www.sinardaily.my/article/171553/malaysia/national/baby-dumping-still-rampant> accessed 22 February 2023
Tiew A and others, ‘An Exploration of Sexual and Reproductive Health (SRH) Services Provided by Private Clinics in Peninsular Malaysia’ (2020)
Tong WT and others, ‘Exploring Pregnancy Termination Experiences and Needs among Malaysian Women: A Qualitative Study’ (2012) 12 BMC Public Health 743
United Nations Population Fund, ‘COVID-19 Pandemic’ (United Nations Population Fund, 2020) <https://www.unfpa.org/covid19> accessed 17 March 2023
Van Ooijen LT and others, ‘A Trans-National Examination of the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Abortion Requests through a Telemedicine Service’ (2022) 48 BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health 179
Walsh J, Møllmann M and Heimburger A, ‘Abortion and Human Rights: Examples from Latin America’ (2009) 39 IDS Bulletin 28
Women’s Aid Organisation, ‘We Must Improve Maternal, Sexual, and Reproductive Health Rights in Malaysia - Women’s Aid Organisation’ (25 April 2022) <https://wao.org.my/we-must-improve-maternal-sexual-and-reproductive-health-rights-in-malaysia/> accessed 18 March 2023
Zailani S, Zainuddin Y and Omar A, ‘Telemedicine in the Malaysian Public Hospitals: Are We There Yet?’ [2009] International Conference on Busines, Finance and Tourism Management
Zeiler K, ‘Reproductive Autonomous Choice – A Cherished Illusion? Reproductive Autonomy Examined in the Context of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis’ (2004) 7 Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 175