LEARNING OUTCOMES FOR A TECHNOLOGICAL ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAM: ELEMNTOS, GUIDE FROM THE APPROACH OF CONCEPTUAL ELEMENTS

Main Article Content

CUÉLLAR-SÁNCHEZDIANA MIREYA, DUEÑAS-PEÑA ÁLEX, VELOZA-LANCHEROS CARLOS KENNEDY

Abstract

The paper presents the theoretical foundations and proposed guidelines that can contribute to the formulation of Learning Outcomes from a series of conceptual elements related to the subject. It is considered that they are the results of a qualitative study of descriptive type. Thus, this is an article that presents a review of the literature in order to recognize aspects, actors, context, among others that contribute to the characterization of learning, and the dynamics and the various variables that revolve in their environment. The literature reviewed addresses different exposures, including public policies on learning outcomes, according to the Ministry of Higher Education. The proposal that will help to confront this need that higher education institutions currently experience, such as the coherent formulation of learning outcomes regardless of the program that requires them, was left to the consideration of the interested parties.

Article Details

Section
Education Law
Author Biography

CUÉLLAR-SÁNCHEZDIANA MIREYA, DUEÑAS-PEÑA ÁLEX, VELOZA-LANCHEROS CARLOS KENNEDY

Cuéllar-SánchezDiana Mireya1; Dueñas-Peña, Álex2;  Veloza-Lancheros Carlos Kennedy3

1Universidad Colegio Mayor de Cundinamarca. Programa Tecnología en Asistencia Gerencial.

2Universidad Colegio Mayor de Cundinamarca. Programa Tecnología en Asistencia Gerencial.

3Universidad Militar Nueva Granada. Facultad de Ciencias Económicas Campos          

References

Adam, S. (2004), Using Learning Outcomes: A consideration of the nature, role, application and implications for European education of employing learning outcomes at the local, national and international levels. Report on United Kingdom Bologna Seminar, July 2004, Herriot-Watt University

ANECA. (2013). Support Guide for Writing, Implementing and Assessing Learning Outcomes Version 1.0. Cyan, Proyectos Editoriales, S.A.

Araya-Pizarro, S.C.,yEspinoza Pastén, L. (2020). Contributions from neurosciences to the understanding of processesoflearningintheContextsEducational. Purposes and Representations, 8(1), e312. two: http://dx.doi.org/10.20511/pyr2020.v8n1.312

Arroyave-Puerta, A.M., and Marulanda-Valencia, F.Á. (2019). Ecoemprendimiento, sustainability and value generation. EAN Magazine, (87), 155-172.

Ballesteros-Ballesteros, V.A. (2020). An initial approach to learning outcomes in higher education. Scientific Review, (39), 259-261.

Belz, F. Binder, J. (2017). Sustainable entrepreneurship: a convergent process model. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(1), 1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1887

Beneitone, P., Esquetini, C., González, J., Maletá, M.M., Siufi, G., yWagenaar, R. (2007). Reflections and perspectives of Higher Education in Latin America. Final Report–Project Tits–Latin America 2004-2007. University of Deusto/University of Deusto Groningen.

Bloom, B.S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. McKay.

Bredo, E. (2006). Conceptual confusion and educational psychology. In P. A. Alexander y P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 43-57). Erlbaum.

Cedefop, A. (2010). Learning outcomes approaches in VET curricula. A comparative analysis of nine european countries. Research paper, (6). http://www.cedefop.europa.eu/EN/Files/5506_en.pdf

Cera-Cera, D., y Morales-Narváez, A. (2022). Problem-based learning as a strategy to develop reading skills in primary school students [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. Corporación Universidad de la Costa.

Decree 1330 of 2019 [with force of law]. "By which Chapter 2 is replaced and Chapter 7 of Title 3 of Part 5 of Book 2 of Decree 1075 of 2015 - Sole Regulatory of the Education Sector is deleted". July 25, 2019.

Estrada-Sentí, V., Febles-Rodríguez, J.P. (2008). Methodological aspects of Knowledge Management in organizations. Management Brochures Magazine.

Fowler, B. (2002). Bloom's taxonomy and critical thinking. Gabriel Piedrahita U. Foundation Published on September, 1-4.

Gagné, R. (1987). The conditions of learning. Inter-American

Gao, T., Chai, Y. & Liu, Y. (2018). A review of knowledge management about theoretical conception and designing approaches. International Journal of Crowd Science, 2(1), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijcs-08-2017-0023

Gómez, M. A., La Rivera, F. M., & Atencio, E. (2019). Evaluation of management competencies for the training of civil engineers. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación en Ingeniería (RIEI), 1.

Gonzalez, P. (2009). Economic, social and cultural rights. Gerardo Molina Chair. Kimpres, Universidad Libre de Colombia.

Harden, R. M. (2002). Learning outcomes and instructional objectives: is there a difference?. Medical Teacher, 24(2), 151-155.

Jenkins, A. & Unwin, D. (2001), How to write learning outcomes.

Lion, C. (2022). Learning and technologies: Skills of the present, projections of the future. Noveduc.

Macias, P. G., y Zamora, R. G. (2020). 2020: the capital pandemicwe are global. MachdohnilLimited.

Martín Galán, B., y Rodríguez Mateos, D. (2012). The evaluation of blended and online university training in the context of the EHEA through the use of the activity reports of the Moodle platform. ITEN-Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 15(1), 159–178. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.1.15.782

Martínez, J. and Fernández, And.(2018). Learning ecologies: Expanded education in multiple contexts. Morata Editions.

Meckes, L. (2013). Standards and initial teacher training. Draft for discussion. http://politicasdocentesalc.com/index.php/documentos

Montaño, A. M. (2013). Higher Education in Latin America: reflections and perspectives in Education. Tuning Latin America Project. Publications of the University of Deusto.

Morales Bueno, P. (2018). Problem-based learning (PBL) and critical thinking skills: a binding relationship? Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 21(2), 91-108.

Muñoz, L. D. C. (2020). Key elements of business innovation. A review from contemporary trends. Innova ITFIP Magazine, 6(1), 50-69.

Nava-Rodríguez, T. and Pazos-Lopez, wing. and Cruz-Redondo, To. and Sanchez-Gold, J.J. (2014). Manual for the Renewal of Teaching Guides. Writing, review and evaluation of Learning Outcomes. Manual. Faculty of Geography and history, UCM.

OECD. (2005). Oslo Handbook: A Guide to the Collection and Interpretation of Innovation Data. http://www.itq.edu.mx/convocatorias/manualdeoslo.pdf

Olivera, S.W. (2011). Taxonomy of bloom. Universidad Cesar Vallejo, 4.

Ormrod, J. (2005). Human learning. (4th ed.). Pearson Education

Ortiz-Torres, E. (1997). Pedagogical communication and school learning.

Osorio, N. (2012). Complex thinking and transdisciplinarity emerge phenomena of a new rationality. In: Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Económicas de la Universidad Militar Nueva Granada. rev.fac.cienc.econ, XX (1).

Paredes, M.D., y Salerno, M.L. (2015). Towards managed learning from the perspective of knowledge. University of Córdoba.

Porter, M. & Kramer, M. (2011). The creation of Shared Value. Harvard Business Review.

Roces, C., Touron, J., and González-Torres, M.C. (1995). Preliminary validation of CEAM II (Questionnaire of Learning Strategies and Motivation II).

Sanchez, F.M., Santos, C., y Sentí, V.E. (2019). Knowledge management and learning. Methodological aspects. UCE Science. Graduate Journal, 7(2).

Schunk, D. (1991). Learning theories. An educational perspective. McMillan

Senge, P. (2010). The fifth discipline: art and the practice of organization open to learning. Ed. Granica.

Shapiro, S. (2005). Innovate to be Competitive.

Tapia, H. (2022). Cognitive learning driving self-regulation in the construction of knowledge. Journal of Social Sciences (Ve), XXVIII (Special 5), 172-183.

Toohey, S. (1999), Designing Courses for Higher Education. Buckingham: SRHE and OU Press.

Torres-Flórez, D. (2020). The generation of value between people and organizations. GEON Journal (Management, Organizations and Business), 7(1), 4-8.

UNESCO. (2005). UNESCO World Report: Towards Knowledge Societies. Unesco Editions.

Urquizo, H.G. (2018). Proposal for measurement and evaluation of Learning Outcomes according to ABET and ASIIN criteria. In Proceedings of the 16th LACCEI International Multi-Conference for Engineering, Education, and Technology, Lima, Peru. 19-21.

Vázquez-Cruz, M.D.Á., Cordero-Arroyo, G., and Leyva-Barajas, Y.E. (2014). Comparative analysis of professional performance criteria for teaching in four countries of the Americas. Research News in Education, 14(3), 434-455.

Velasquez, F.R. (2001). Approaches to human learning. Department of Behavioral Science and Technology. Simon Bolivar University.

Zaim, H., Muhammed, S. &Tarim, M. (2019). Relationship between knowledge management processes and performance: critical role of knowledge utilization in organizations. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 17(1), 24–38.

Morales, J. T. (2011). Phenomenology and hermeneutics as the epistemology of research. Paradigm, 32(2), 007-022.

UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF CUNDINAMARCA (2019). Pedagogical, communicational and technological guidelines to guide the design of academic programs in distance and virtual mode.