NETWORK ANALYSIS OF SLUM MANAGEMENT POLICIES IN THE CIAMIS REGENCY
Main Article Content
Abstract
The management of slum areas in Ciamis Regency is still not running effectively to support the achievement of sustainable, healthy, and livable settlement objectives based on social value, economic value, and environmental value. This study was done to look at how slum settlement areas are managed in the Ciamis Regency. In-depth interviews, field research, and literature analysis were used as part of the qualitative research methodology. Techniques for data analysis included data reduction, data display, and generating conclusions. The findings indicated that non-governmental players, namely university professors, must still be considered when formulating strategies for slum upgrading.The involvement of the business world is still lacking to provide assistance funds in handling slums. Regional apparatus organizations still have different programs and interests so coordination, synergy, and cooperation between actors have not been built and the handling of slums is hampered. Then, there is no regional regulation as a reference and legal basis for implementation to provide legal certainty for stakeholders in efforts to implement slum upgrading in Ciamis Regency.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Abrams, C. (1964). Housing in the Modern World, London: Faber and Faber.
Creswell, W, John (2012) ResearchDesign (Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, Yogyakarta: PutakaPelajar.
DeLeon, D. M. V. (2009). Toward a Theory of Collaborative Policy Networks: Identifying Structural Tendencies.The Policy Studies Journal, 37(1), 59–74.
Djuyandi, Y., Solihah, R., & Witianti, S. (2020). The impact of globalisation on the privatisation policy of some state enterprises in Indonesia. Hamdard Islamicusthis link is disabled, 43(S2), 363–373.
Dye,T.R.(1992)UnderstandingPublicPolicy,Prentice-Hall,INC.,USA.
Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (1995). Studying Public Policy: PolicyCycles and Policy Subsystems, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kickert, W.J.M., Klijn, E.H., and Koppenjan, J.F.M. (1997) Managing Complex Networks. Strategies for the Public Sector, London: SAGE Publications.
Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1992). Analisis Data Kualitatif, Jakarta: UI Press
Mustopadidjaja, A.R. (2003). Manajemen Proses Kebijakan Publik, Formulasi, Implementasi dan Evaluasi Kinerja, Jakarta: LAN.
Muta’ali, L., & Nugroho, A. R. (2013). Perkembangan Program PenangananPermukimanKumuh di Indonesia dari Masa Ke Masa. (Siti, Ed.). Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Raab, J., &Kenis, P. N. (2009). Heading toward a society of networks: Empirical developments and theoretical challenges. Journal of Management Inquiry, 18(3), 198-210.
Rindarjono, M.G. (2012). Slum:Kajian PermukimanKumuhDalamPerspektifSpasial, Yogyakarta: Media Perkasa.
Rusli, B. (2013). Kebijakan Publik. MembangunPelayanan Publik yang Responsif. Bandung: Hakim Publisher.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (2006). The Oxford Handbooks Of Public Policy. New York: the United States by Oxford University Press Inc.
Sarwono, S.W. (1992). PsikologiLingkungan. Jakarta: Gramedia
Suharno. (2013). Dasar-dasarKebijakan Publik: Kajian Proses dan AnalisisKebijakan. Yogyakarta: PenerbitOmbak
Sastra M., Suparno, &Marlina, E. (2005). Perencanaan dan PengembanganPerumahan.Yogyakarta: Penerbit ANDI.
Waarden F. V. (1992). Dimensions and Types of Policy Networks. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Wart, M.V. (1998). Changing Public Sector Values, London: Garland Publishing, Inc.