CRIME VICTIMS' PERCEPTION OF THE PROCESS OF CRIMINAL CASE BY LAW ENFORCEMENT IN INDONESIA

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Apr 7, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52783/rlj.v11i3.1028
Keywords:
Law Victims of crime Perception of victims Law enforcement

Main Article Content

BAHARUDDIN BADARU, RADESYA PRATIWI BAHARUDDIN

Abstract

In the process of criminal justice, the victims are not actively involved. The criminal court arbitrates perpetrators because they were charged with violation of the criminal law, not the violation of the victims' rights, even though the victim suffered due to the cases. The police officer and prosecutors act not to represent the interests of the victims, but rather to represent the state or the interests of society in general. The process of resolving criminal cases through criminal justice attracts particular attention for the victim or party who mostly suffered from the circumstances. This study aims to determine the victim's perception of the completion of the case that happened to him by the Law Officers. The study was conducted in Makassar city, Indonesia, with 100 respondents.

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 11 No. 3 (2023)
Section
Criminal Law
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Author Biography

BAHARUDDIN BADARU, RADESYA PRATIWI BAHARUDDIN

BAHARUDDIN BADARU

Faculty of Law, Universitas Muslim Indonesia

(First Author & Corresponding Author)

RADESYA PRATIWI BAHARUDDIN

References

ABDURRAHMAN, M. (2009). Sosiologi dan Metode Penelitian Hukum. Malang: UMM.

ASSIDIQIE, J. (2000). Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. Jakarta: Mappi.

BOVEN, T. V. (2002). Mereka yang Menjadi Korban. Jakarta.: ELSAM.

CHEURPRAKOBKIT, S., & BARTSCH, R. A. (2001). Police performance: A model for assessing citizen’s satisfaction and the importance of police attributes. Police Quarterly, 4, 449-468.

FADILLAH, C., & SYARIF. (2004). Korban Kejahatan dalam Perspektif Viktimoloig dan Hukum Pidana Islam. Jakarta.: Ghalia Press.

FAISAL. (2010). Menerobos Positivisme Hukum,. Yogyakarta: Rengkong Education.

HADJON, P. M., & DJATMIATI, T. S. (2005). Argumentasi Hukum. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Presss.

HATTA, M. (2008). Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu. Yogyakarta: Galang Press.

HUDA, C. (2006). Dari Tiada Pidana tanpa Kesalahan Menuju kepada Tiada Pertanggungjawaban Pidana tanpa Kesalahan. Jakarta: Prenada Media.

KALIGIS, O. C. (2006). Perlindungan Hukum Atas Hak Asasi Tersangka, Terdakwa dan Terpidana,. Bandung: Alumni.

KELSEN, H. (2008). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Normatif (diterjemahkan oleh Nurulita Yusron). Jakarta.: Nusamedia.

KOSTER, N.-S. N. (2017). Victims’ perceptions of the police response as a predictor of victim cooperation in the Netherlands: a prospective analysis. Psychology, Crime & Law, Vol 23 no. 3, DOI: 10.1080/1068316X.2016.1239098, 201-220.

KRISTIANA, Y. (2009). Menuju Kejaksaan Progresif ,Studi tentang Penyelidikan, Penyidikan dan Penuntutan Tindak Pidana. Yogyakarta: LSHP.

KUFFAL, H. (2002). Penerapan KUHAP Dalam Praktek Hukum. Malang: UMM.

LATIF, A. (2010). Jaminan UUD 1945 dalam Proses Hukum yang Adili. Jurnal Konstitusi, Mahkamah Konstitusi Vol. 7 No. 1, 49-65.

MARPAUNG, L. (2009). Proses Penanganan Perkara pidana (Penyelidikan dan Penyidikan). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

MILONO. (2004). Implementasi Due Process of Law dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: UI.

MUHAMMAD, R. (2006). Potret Lembaga Pengadilan Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajawali Presss.

MULYADI, L. (2007). Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana , Kriminologi dan Viktimologi. Jakarta: Djambatan.

MULYADI, L. (2008). Bunga Rampai Hukum Pidana Perspektif, Teoritis dan Praktif. Bandung: Alumni.

MUZAKKIR. (2001). Kedudukan Korban Kejahatan dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Yogyakarta: UII.

Poerlawandari, K. E. (2000). Kekuasaan Terhadap Perempuan, Tinjauan Psikologi. Alumni: Bandung.

RAHARDI, P. (2007). Hukum Kepolisian (Profesionalisme dan Reformasi Polri). Surabaya: Laksbang Mediatama.

SARGEANT, E., MURPHY, K., & CHERNEY, A. (2014). Ethnicity, trust, and cooperation with police: Testing the dominance of the process-based model. European Journal of Criminology, 11(4), doi:10.1177/1477370813511386, 500-524.

SUNARYO, S. (2004). Kapita Selekta Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Malang: UMM.

SUNGGONO, B. (2001). Metode Peneltiian Hukum. Jakarta: Radja Grafindo Persada.

TAHIR, H. (2010). Proses Hukum Yang Adil Dalam, Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: LaksBang PRESSindo.

TARLING, R., & MORRIS, K. (2010). Reporting crime to the police. British Journal of Criminology, 50(3), doi:10.1093/bjc/azq011, 474-490.

TYLER, T. R. (2005). Policing in Black and White: Ethnic group differences in trust and confidence in the police. Police Quarterly, 8(3) doi:10.1177/1098611104271105, 322–342.

WINATA, F. H. (2000). Bantuan Hukum Suatu Hak Asasi Manusia Bukan Belas Kasihan. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo.

WU, Y., & SUN, I. Y. (2009). Citizens trust in police: The case of China. Police Quarterly, 12(2) doi:10.1177.1098611108330228, 170–191.

YULIA, R. (2010). Viktimologi, Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Kejahatan,. Yogyakarta: Graha UIN.